D-Day Squadron Announces 2024 European Tour

Published in Midwest Flyer Magazine October/November 2022 Digital Issue

OXFORD, CT. – The D-Day Squadron announced at EAA AirVenture Oshkosh 2022, a plan to return to Europe in 2024 for the 80th anniversary of D-Day in France, and the 75th anniversary of the Berlin Airlift in Germany. In 2019, the D-Day Squadron took a fleet of 15 WWII-era DC-3s to England, France, and Germany. Following the successful 2019 mission, the D-Day Squadron has continued to be present at multiple flyovers, aviation events, and warbird-themed airshows.

“Having led the DC-3s’ journey to Europe in 2019, the D-Day Squadron earned a global presence that’s provided our organization to grow, multiply our DC-3 presence and even launch the DC-3 Society where we actively aid operators and enthusiasts with maintenance, operations, airworthiness, and displays,” shared Eric Zipkin, director of operations and mission chief pilot for the D-Day Squadron. “We won the war because of our logistical abilities. It’s only appropriate we, as the stewards of this noble aircraft, continue to fly and maintain the very airframe that was the backbone to achieving victory.”

Orchestrating a tour of this magnitude takes considerable resources and cooperation from several different organizations. The D-Day Squadron is advising several DC-3 operations in North America, Europe and Southeast Asia planning to participate in Europe 2024. The Commemorative Air Force (CAF), the world’s largest flying museum, is one of the organizations that will collaborate with the D-Day Squadron for the tour. CAF President Hank Coates said, “We are excited to work with the D-Day Squadron on another mission to Europe. When we participated in 2019, it was wonderful to see how many people were impacted by seeing our aircraft and aircrews paying tribute to these important moments in history.”

Planning for the mission is already underway. A volunteer committee of seasoned professionals is being established to help organize and manage logistics in support of another remarkable mission to honor, pay tribute, and commemorate World War II veterans.

For more event information from the D-Day Squadron: https://ddaysquadron.org/events/

Follow the D-Day Squadron flyovers, events, and other missions on Facebook and Instagram. Subscribe to the YouTube Channel for the latest video productions.

Follow the Commemorative Air Force on Facebook and Instagram. Subscribe to the YouTube Channel for the latest productions.

Learn More About the 2019 Mission

The D-Day Squadron started screening “Into Flight Once More,” a film that documents the 2019 journey. Several film premiers and screenings across the U.S. this year included having multiple DC-3s from the film on display for audiences. Produced by Sound Off Films and narrated by Gary Sinise, the film brings to life the stories of World War II veterans, crews, and a most historic reenactment of “Operation Overlord,” the codename for the Battle of Normandy, which took place on June 6, 1944. Currently, the film is available to watch on four steaming platforms including Apple TV, YouTube, Amazon Prime, and Hulu.

 

About the DC-3 Society & D-Day Squadron

The DC-3 Society is a program of the D-Day Squadron with the purpose of promoting DC-3 type aircraft airworthiness, serve members, and promote static and flying displays for future generations. The North American DC-3 Society was born to organize the collective efforts of enthusiasts, pilots, mechanics, and operators. It actively educates and involves the next generation in “flying freedom” and celebrates everything the DC-3 has accomplished in war and peace.

The D-Day Squadron is part of the Tunison Foundation, a non-profit 501(c)(3) charitable organization. In June 2019, the D-Day Squadron led an American fleet of 15 historic, restored C-47 World War II military aircraft to take part in a flyover of more than 30 international aircraft to drop over 200 paratroopers over the original 1944 drop zones in Normandy, commemorating the 75th anniversary of D-Day. The event honored the citizen soldiers of the war, whose bravery led the Allies to the liberation of France, and then to an end of the devastating war in Europe. The squadron’s education program takes the compelling story of the citizen soldier to audiences at airshows and events off the flightline to honor these brave Americans and ensure their memory and significance are appreciated for generations to come. The group’s efforts are funded through the generous tax-deductible contribution of their supporters. Learn more at DDaySquadron.org.

About the Commemorative Air Force

Founded in 1957, the Commemorative Air Force (CAF) serves to educate, inspire, and honor through flight and living history experiences. The non-profit organization has amassed more than 180 World War II aircraft – the largest collection of vintage military warbirds in the world. Through the work of more than 12,000 volunteers across 80 units, the CAF’s educational outreach programs reach an estimated 20 million Americans each year, providing unique, compelling hands-on access to history. For more information about the Commemorative Air Force, visit www.commemorativeairforce.org.

Posted in Aircraft, Oct/Nov 2022, Sections, Sections | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Contributions By An Aviation Great Deserve Recognition

by Dave Weiman
Published in Midwest Flyer Magazine October/November 2022 Digital Issue

(L/R) Tom Poberezny welcomed Dave Weiman to the EAA Aviation Museum in 1983, which was under construction at the time, and which would eventually become the Poberezny family’s legacy.

Former EAA President and Chairman, Tom Poberezny, 75, passed away the morning of July 25, 2022, the opening day of EAA AirVenture Oshkosh 2022, an event he chaired for 36 years (1976-2011). Unfortunately, most members and patrons who walked through the gates that day were not even aware of Tom’s passing, or of his many contributions and accomplishments in aviation that helped make their special day possible, and knowing Tom, he would not want his passing to ruin their day. That’s not what Tom worked so hard for all those many years. Just the opposite. As Chairman of EAA and EAA AirVenture Oshkosh, Tom wanted people to enjoy the event, whether that was in attending the hundreds of forums, viewing the thousands of aircraft on display, visiting exhibitors, seeing old friends and meeting new ones, or being entertained at the daily airshows and evening events.

Let us not ever forget that it was Tom Poberezny who spearheaded the construction of the EAA Aviation Museum in Oshkosh, Wisconsin in 1983, and whose leadership skills helped to bring EAA AirVenture Oshkosh to world prominence. It was also Tom Poberezny who founded EAA’s Young Eagles Program, introducing millions of young people to aviation.

Tom and his father, EAA Founder Paul Poberezny, were supportive of Midwest Flyer Magazine (then Wisconsin Flyer) from the get-go in 1978. Thanks to Tom, we were later welcomed to the airshow entertainment industry as publishers, and EAA AirVenture Oshkosh became the forum we used each year to recognize airshow professionals and others for their contributions and accomplishments.

Tom’s aviation career included national and world aerobatic competition, and he was a member of the famed Eagles Aerobatic Team for their entire 25 years (1979 to 1995), along with Gene Soucy and the late Charlie Hillard.

It is hoped that steps will be taken soon to ensure that Tom’s contributions to EAA and general aviation are recognized in the EAA Museum, more than they are today.

RIP Tom and thank you for all you did for general aviation, and for us personally.

Posted in Columns, Columns, Columns, Dialogue, EAA & AirVenture, Oct/Nov 2022 | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Spot Landing Contest Once Again Hits The Spot!

Published in Midwest Flyer Magazine October/November 2022 Digital Issue

Experienced and inexperienced pilots alike participated in this year’s “Spot Landing Contest,” September 10, 2022, at Milwaukee Lawrence J Timmerman Airport (KMWC). A young lady competed in the contest for the first time, exactly one year after she took a “Discovery Flight,” and a young man 12 years of age, also competed for the first time with his flight instructor.

Milwaukee County, which owns and operates Timmerman Airport and Milwaukee General Mitchell International Airport (KMKE), provides a grand prize of $200.00 and food and refreshments. The prize money added to the fun, but it was the challenge of the competition that lured pilots from as far as Oshkosh, Wisconsin. The contest was hosted by Spring City Aviation to promote safety and the airport.

Participants arrived at Timmerman by 10:00 a.m. for a mandatory safety briefing. The contest got underway at 10:15 a.m.

Each contestant was given two attempts to land on the white target line, or as close beyond the line as possible, and only the best landing counted. Any landing short of the line was not counted.

Pilots had their choice of executing a touch-and-go to reenter the pattern for their second attempt, or landing to a full stop, then taxiing back to takeoff again.

Power and flap adjustments could be used to make the most accurate landing, but flaps could not be raised unless executing a go-around.

Legitimate go-arounds were okay, as safety was the focus of the contest. But go-arounds were not to be used to cheat.

Jamming, slamming, or deliberately landing hard on the runway was not acceptable. Only normal, descent landings counted. The judges adjusted scores for any such landings that resulted in bouncing, side-loads or porpoising.

Only three aircraft could be in the pattern at any one time, and the judges’ decisions were final.

When it was their turn, pilots contacted Timmerman Ground and informed the controller they were participating in the contest and ready to taxi to the designated runway.
Pilots then taxied out in assigned groups of three to avoid congestion on the taxiway, but procedurally, there were no shortcuts. Pilots did their normal preflight checks and runups at the end of the runway.

The airport remained open during the competition, and participants got excellent cooperation from the tower. Transient aircraft were given the right-of-way, so as not to disrupt normal airport operations.

This year’s winners were:

Zach Davies of Waukesha, Wis., 1st place with a distance of 8 feet (middle in black).
Sam Treffinger of Mukwonago, Wis., 2nd place with a distance of 11 feet (far left in blue).
Curtis Sweeney of Oshkosh, Wis., 3rd place with a distance of 12 feet (middle in green).
Ryan Krueger of Waukesha, Wis., who nearly had a perfect landing but bounced slightly just before the line, received honorable mention (pictured far right in blue).

For a firsthand look at the contest, watch the livestream: https://www.facebook.com/TimmermanAirport/videos/5574995855894580

In addition to the “Spot Landing Contest” in September, Milwaukee County also sponsors a “Flour Drop Contest” in June.

Posted in All Headlines, Events, Headlines, Headlines, Oct/Nov 2022 | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Airport Layout Plans: A collaborative effort that ensures safety, efficiency, and funding for public airports.

by Matt Lebens
Airport Development Engineer, North Region – MnDOT Office of Aeronautics
Published in Midwest Flyer Magazine October/November 2022 Digital Issue

An Airport Layout Plan (ALP) is a formal public document required by MnDOT and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and consists of a set of large format (24” x 36”) detailed overhead drawings of the entire airport. ALPs are important because they give airport managers and others a comprehensive and accessible picture of airport infrastructure that helps provide a long-term, comprehensive planning strategy. ALPs may be prepared in conjunction with, and in support of master plans, long-term comprehensive plans (LTCPs), and zoning documents. The Narrative Report or Master Plan that typically accompanies the ALP provides detailed information about current and projected activity levels at the airport, facility requirements, alternatives and recommendations, and an implementation plan.

There are somewhat different ALP requirements in Minnesota depending on whether the airport is in the federal system, or the airport is state funded only. Airports in the FAA Report, National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS), need to meet all state and federal rules and design criteria. Non-NPIAS airports in Minnesota must prepare ALPs according to state guidelines. Individual layout sheets that comprise the airport layout plan set will vary with each planning effort. Drawings that might be included are described below:

• Title Sheet – A separate cover sheet, with approval signature blocks, airport location maps, and other pertinent information.

• Airport Data Sheet

• Airport Layout Plan – Shows the entire airport and depicts details of the existing and future airport facilities. (See example below.)

• Terminal/Building Area Drawing – Shows all existing or planned buildings and related infrastructure. It is used to review safety, security, and funding eligibility. (See example below.)

• Inner portion of the approach surface drawing – Shows details of the approach surfaces and other zones, such as those required by the local FAA office or state agency, runway protection zone, clear zone, Zone A, etc.

• Airport Airspace Drawing

• Zoning/Land-Use Drawing

• Airport Property Map/Exhibit A Sheet

ALP drawings typically show the airport as it exists today, plus near-term plans (0-5 years), long-term plans (6-10 years), and potential development plans (11-20 years). The ALP includes the facility’s graphical plan layout with design and operational data, airspace information required for aircraft approach and departure procedures, building area graphics and meteorological data, as well as property and land-use information for the airport and surrounding area. That information is important, as it is used to develop and implement airport licensing, safety zoning, and community land-use requirements.

On average, it takes approximately two years to complete an ALP and they are typically updated every five to 10 years, depending on the airport’s classification and development needs. Current, well-prepared, and approved ALPs are vital for safe, effective operations and development of Minnesota airports. An approved ALP ensures the safety, utility, and efficiency of the airport, helps plan and deliver maintenance and improvement projects that meet design standards, and are required for public funding. Up-to-date airport planning documents allow better funding decisions for each airport, and across the entire aviation system.

In order to prepare an ALP, a consultant is typically tasked by the airport sponsor to prepare the document. ALPs require coordination between the Airport’s sponsor, consultants, FAA, MnDOT Aeronautics office, airport users, key stakeholders, and public involvement activities. There will be a review of the airport’s existing conditions, determination of current and future airport “design aircraft,” fixed based aircraft, and operations forecasts, determination of facility needs, evaluation of potential alternatives, and estimates of capital costs and phases. Good communication between all stakeholders is a critical component to creating a quality ALP. Pilots and other users can contribute by reporting any perceived unsafe or inefficient operational conditions to the airport manager or the MnDOT Aeronautics office. We’re always open to new ideas, and welcome input from those who use our airports to help keep infrastructure safe, well maintained, and functional for pilots and the local community.

Developing an ALP, and their associated reports, is a collaborative effort that involves the airport sponsor, airport users, the surrounding community, and State and Federal agencies. A quality ALP provides the necessary information to maintain a safe, cost-effective airport – one that creates and enriches economic and recreational opportunities for the community it serves, for years.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Matthew Lebens is the P.E. Principal Engineer for the North Region with the MnDOT Office of Aeronautics, Airport Development Section. He started working at MnDOT in 1987. He graduated from the University of Minnesota in 2004 with a degree in Civil Engineering. He started at Aeronautics in 2015 and has been working continuously in the North Region since then.

Posted in Airports, Columns, Columns, Columns, Oct/Nov 2022, Wisconsin Aeronautics Report | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

How Does That Work? FAA Air Traffic Control At EAA AirVenture Oshkosh

Published in Midwest Flyer Magazine October/November 2022 Digital Issue

Chris Bildilli Photos

OSHKOSH, WIS. – FAA air traffic controllers say working EAA AirVenture Oshkosh held the last week in July is the “Super Bowl” of air traffic control. The convention brings in thousands of airplanes of all types in a fast environment that makes Oshkosh one of the busiest airports and air traffic control towers in the world.

For their work, these controllers will not earn a Super Bowl ring. Instead, they wear a coveted fluorescent pink polo shirt – which is necessary on the runways and is the high-visibility mark of an FAA AirVenture air traffic controller.

The FAA has staffed a tower at the EAA convention since the 1960s. FAA Air Traffic staff, including controllers, supervisors, and managers, annually apply to work this event from the FAA’s 17-state Central Terminal Service Area and from its Eastern Service Area.

This year, 65 controllers, along with additional supervisors and operations managers, were selected, representing multiple FAA air traffic facilities.

The controllers are divided into 16 teams of four persons each:

One “veteran” controller serves as the team leader and a second veteran may also be part of the team. Each of these controllers will have three or more years of previous EAA AirVenture experience.

At least one member of the team will have one to two years of EAA AirVenture experience. This group is identified as the “limited” category.

The final member of each team will be new to AirVenture duty and is identified as a “rookie.”

It is important to note that even an “Oshkosh rookie” has many years of training and experience and is a Certified Professional Controller (CPC) in his or her home facility.

These teams stay together throughout the convention as they rotate through the Oshkosh control tower, the Fond du Lac tower, at FISK VFR Approach Control, and at the mobile departure platforms known as MOOCOWs (Mobile Operating and Communications Workstations).

Larger Network

Throughout the Midwest, there are many other FAA air traffic controllers and maintenance technicians who take on additional workload and responsibility to ensure flights to and from AirVenture are as safe and efficient as possible.

For example, controllers at the FAA’s Milwaukee TRACON (Terminal Radar Approach Control) will work all IFR (Instrument Flight Rules) traffic arriving and departing the area. These controllers may seem far removed from the action, but they are just as involved as the controllers on the Oshkosh airfield.

FAA’s AirVenture Goals

The FAA’s participation in the week-long event goes beyond air traffic. It focuses on three key goals:
• Ensure efficient air traffic operations during the event.
• Improve the safety culture of the General Aviation community.
• Reach out to the public regarding important aviation safety topics.

For the FAA, AirVenture is the “Super Bowl” of air traffic control, but it’s also the “Super Bowl” of General Aviation safety.

Posted in EAA & AirVenture, Oct/Nov 2022, Sections, Sections | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

THE SKY AND I

by Ann Holtgren Pellegreno
Published in Midwest Flyer Magazine October/November 2022 Digital Issue

LEARNING TO FLY
1960 TO 1961
YOUNG FIELD
ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN

First Part of Chapter One
First Flying Lesson, August 29, 1960

“Be sure your seatbelt is tight. Put your hands and feet on the controls,” Jim hollered from the back seat.

I nodded.

The throttle knob eased forward, taking my left hand with it. I felt the rudder pedals twitch under my feet and the stick move back and forth slightly in my right hand. The engine responded, and the little blue airplane surged forward. Bumping and rattling, the Champ raced over the turf.

Suddenly, the jouncing ceased. We were airborne, skimming the trees at the end of the runway. So, this was flying. It was my first time in an airplane and my first flight lesson.

Never had I imagined I would learn to fly!

Growing up south of Chicago, my parents – Aba and Clifford Holtgren – took my younger sister Lois and me to Midway Airport to meet arriving relatives. That was exciting!

When they departed, we sisters put our thin dimes in the collection box for admission to the observation deck. There we watched as engines were started and the airliner moved slowly toward the runway. We watched it thunder down the runway and climb up into the sky until the silver wings disappeared. Someday, I promised myself, I would be the one departing.

But, never had I thought about becoming a pilot!

As a youth. I remember buying a model kit for a wooden Piper Cub, assembling it, and painting it bright yellow. Airplanes were intriguing, but I felt aviation far removed from me. Little did I know then that future circumstances would make it possible for me to be personally involved in the world of flight.

After Don and I married in 1958, we visited Whidbey Island Naval Air Station where his brother was a pilot. Long conversations centered on flying. Neither of us had ever been up in the air. We listened to his brother tell about learning to land, the satisfaction of that solo flight, and flying to distant cities.

Don and I decided to become part of this aviation world. We joined the flying club at Young Field, near Ann Arbor, Michigan. We took our first lessons on August 29, 1960. Flying in the beautiful blue Aeronca Champion that day was the beginning of my aviation life and also of this book.

Last Part of Chapter One

Why doesn’t he tell me how much back pressure. I didn’t like those dizzying spirals either. They made my head light when coupled with the drone of the engine and the constant bouncing.

“Well, try one to the right. Remember back pressure.”

“Back pressure,” I mumbled. Right stick. Right rudder. Neutralize. Back pressure. Still the Champ circled downward toward a wheat field. I pulled back harder. Getting angry, I thought, why couldn’t he let me fly straight and level? There would be plenty of time to learn turns later.

Jim leveled the plane. I set my lips in a hard, determined line as I banked again to the right. The turn tightened and we lost altitude.

“Watch the altimeter,” Jim advised. “Then you’ll know if you’re losing altitude.” He added power and the plane returned once again to 2000 feet.

Now, where was that altimeter? There it was. The long needle was indicating 2000 feet. I hoped it would stay there the next time I tried a turn.

“I’ll show you one more,” Jim said as he banked the plane, executing a perfect circle. It seemed so easy. Was he showing off?

“Try another turn,” he said.

This time I completed the circle. The altimeter registered 1700 feet. But the turn hadn’t tightened as much as the other ones.

Jim sighed and said, “Well, let’s call it a day.”

Maybe now he would take over. No such luck. He asked, “Where’s the airport?” From the sound of his voice, there was probably a wide grin on his face. Fortunately, there was a bright orange-backed drive-in screen adjacent to the airport. I pointed. One thing in my favor for the day!

Jim turned the plane toward the airport and, apparently, planned to fly. Now I was free to enjoy being aloft. Below, the fields were divided into squares and gravel roads formed their boundaries. How neat everything looked from this altitude.

Nearing the airport, Jim turned the plane southeast, paralleling the longer runway. Suddenly, the engine seemed to stop, or was it running at reduced power? Jim explained, “We chop power to lose altitude and land. Now, I’ll turn left 90 degrees for base leg.”

His voice seemed louder now that the engine was operating at a lower rpm. The altimeter unwound. Gliding was like going down a slide in slow motion. I yawned to relieve the pressure in my ears from the descent.

The throttle jumped forward as he revved the engine. What now? Reading my thoughts, Jim said, “Just clearing the engine in case we need it.” The engine was idling again. Soon he turned 90 degrees to the left. The runway was ahead. Suddenly, the plane was no longer pointing at the runway, but was cocked at a terrible angle. We were descending sideways, the left wingtip leading us toward the ground. I leaned hard against the right window. Then, the wings were level again.

“Just a slip,” Jim reassured me. “Helps to lose altitude without gaining airspeed by diving. You’ll learn how laer.”

“Much later,” I mumbled.

The little blue Champ skimmed the buildings at the end of the runway. Jim eased back on the stick, and we floated, level with the runway. I waited for the bump. Instead, there was a slight jar as wheels touched turf. Then the rumbling again as the plane rolled, slowing to taxi speed. In front of the office Jim switched the engine off. Instant quiet. He eased himself out of the plane. After unbuckling my seatbelt, I climbed out, slightly unsteadily for my head was buzzing.

Jim told me to buy a logbook in the office. There he methodically entered the details.

Date: August 29, 1960.
Flight from: Young Field
Flight to: Local
7AC AC Aeronca
Registration number N3692E
Engine: Continental
Horsepower: 65
Duration of flight: :45
Day: :45
Night: :00
Dual :45
Remarks: S&L, glides, turns
Jim signed: J.A. Poulter 1240448

“Can you fly again in two days? I have a flight with the airline until then?”

“Fine. What time?”

“Oh, about one.”

“I’ll be here.”

I couldn’t wait to try those turns again.

The car seemed unusually quiet on the drive home. I was tired and felt as if an extraordinary amount of work had been done. But the logbook entry was only 45 minutes.

I put the logbook on the hall table, lay on the couch, and closed my eyes. I envisioned the whirling blur of the propeller and heard the sound of the engine. I was happy knowing that one step had been taken up a long ladder that reached for the sky.

The book “THE SKY AND I”
by ANN HOLTGREN PELLEGRENO
Is available at specialbooks.com for $25.00

EDITOR’S NOTE: Ann Dearing Holtgren Pellegreno is a professional musician, teacher, author, lecturer, and farmer. In 1967, Pellegreno and a crew of three, successfully flew a twin-engine Lockheed 10 Electra, similar to the aircraft flown by Amelia Earhart to complete a world flight that closely mirrored fateful Earhart’s flight plan in 1937.
Flying a twin-engine Lockheed Electra L-10E, Amelia Earhart disappeared over the Pacific Ocean on July 2, 1937, three-fourths of the way on a pioneering attempt at circling the earth’s equator by airplane. Thirty years later, Ann Pellegreno — dubbed “Michigan’s flying housewife” by the wire services — was returning home after four weeks piloting the vintage Lockheed along the same route Earhart had traveled, completing the vanished aviatrix’s legendary unfinished flight.

Pellegreno was born in Chicago, Illinois, in 1937 and graduated from the University of Michigan. Her books include World Flight: The Earhart Trail, Iowa Takes to the Air: 1919-1941, and Iowa Takes to the Air: 1941-2003.

Posted in All Features, Books & Movies, Features, Features, Oct/Nov 2022 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What does an aviation psychologist do? Most general aviation pilots will never see one!

by Bob Worthington
www.BobWorthingtonWriter.com
© Copyright 2022. All rights reserved!
Published in Midwest Flyer Magazine October/November 2022 Digital Issue

Psychologists

What is an aviation psychologist? First allow me to define a psychologist. The psychologist is a professional trained in the study of human behavior. Human behavior encompasses how people think, how they perceive, and how they respond to family, social, or vocational influences and demands. A bachelor’s college degree is the minimum education required to work in the field. Most jobs require at least a master’s degree. To practice independently as a psychologist, most positions call for a doctoral degree, certification, and state licensing.

Psychologists typically serve in one of three capacities: clinical/counseling, consulting/teaching, or research. All deal with how humans behave within certain vocational, family, educational, or social frameworks. Clinicians or counselors collaborate directly with people in a variety of settings in hospitals, mental health clinics, businesses or organizations or specific settings such as education, professional or collegiate sports, law enforcement or legal endeavors (as in the television show “Bull”), even aviation. Consulting psychologists serve as advisors to organizations or industries regarding the utilization of people. Research psychologists use their expertise studying human behavior under distinct settings, such as examining medical conditions and human responses, how to best match people with concepts of new equipment or machines or studying human responses under certain conditions.

Aviation Psychologists

Psychologists serve in a variety of functions involving aviation. I am an aviation psychologist. As a PhD psychologist I was educated to understand how to observe human behavior and to predict how humans will respond to specific stimuli. As a veteran pilot, I have experienced most stressors, demands, and challenges experienced while flying or being in an aircraft (from combat to crash landing).

My specialty is to examine how and why pilots behave in specific situations in flight, such as losing an engine, having equipment failure, facing emergency situations, severe weather, or experiencing personal issues. I then strive to understand what behaviors lead to successful performance and which result in failure. Using this knowledge, I can create educational seminars or lessons explaining what is happening and why, then teach pilots how they can either avoid bad situations or how to effectively manage what is happening. Or write articles depicting lessons learned.

My work as an aviation psychologist began in the military (see my next book, the Making of an Army Psychologist, to be released in September). I would teach Army aviators classes such as managing stress in the cockpit or the psychology of survival after a crash.
The airlines use psychologists to select pilot candidates to hire. Applicants complete psychological instruments measuring personality characteristics to determine which best match those of successful pilots. The military also use aviation psychologists to assist in their selection of pilot candidates.

For example, pilots should tend to follow rules and regulations. If the tests reveal high scores in these areas, that is good. But a candidate with low scores could be a poor selection. On the other hand, airlines do not want “high-risk” pilots, those who will cut corners or compromise safety to complete a mission. Psychological tests can identify candidates with these undesirable personality traits. Airline and military aviation psychologists also support the mental health of flight crews which constantly deal with the demands of time, weather, passengers, schedules, and potential flight hazards, every day on duty.

Family and personal pressures likewise effect behaviors while flying. Airlines and the military have aviation psychologists available to help flight crew effectively deal with personal issues or difficulties ranging from family and marital problems to depression to substance abuse or addictions, such as gambling.

The airlines recognize the pressures and demands on pilots and flight crew members which affect their behavior and flight performance. Additionally, the FAA has strict regulations regarding pilot mental health issues and treatment. And family members are not immune to husbands and wives, mothers and fathers, and brothers and sisters, dealing with mental health difficulties. The airlines and professional pilot organizations have made available to employees, and family members professional help from behavioral scientists (psychologists, psychiatrists, social workers, and mental health counselors), as well as volunteer peer-to-peer counselors.

Aviation research psychologists are trained to understand inflight stressors and can assist in the design of aircraft cockpits or equipment to make utilization or manipulation easiest for humans to accommodate.

Flying can be a challenging endeavor. Learning to be a pilot can be both financially and emotionally demanding and challenging. Military flight school attrition rates can be as high as 25%. Aviation clinical psychologists understand the stressors found in flight training and piloting performance to help aviators more effectively overcome behaviors which interfere with safe flying. Several colleges and universities and major flight schools have psychologists on staff or contract to assist students with a personal crisis that inhibits learning.

The military has a three-week course at the Fort Rucker, Alabama Army Aviation Center of Excellence for military aviation psychologists. This Aeromedical Psychology (the military term for aviation psychology) Training Course teaches Department of Defense clinical, counseling, and research psychologists with doctoral degrees, about the demands and stressors facing military aircrew and how to best help overcome them to remain on flight status.

Aviation psychologists are like aviation accident investigators; most pilots will never meet one. But National Transportation Safety Board data show that up to 80% of aviation accidents are attributed to human error (the data also reveal that 78% of aviation accidents involve general aviation aircraft). This means that someone has failed to do something (or did something wrong) which leads to an incident or accident. This is termed “human factors.”

Human factors involve the study of interactions of people with technology, equipment, devices, or systems, usually in the workplace. The goal of human factors is to make the work environment more efficient and safer. Human factors investigators examine links between what went wrong and human responses. Within the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) aviation investigations, human factors issues are examined by the Human Performance Group which contains aviation psychologists, as well as other human factors scientists, to include industrial designers, engineers, and medical experts. The military also use human factors experts.

The aviation industry has aviation psychologists (both clinicians and researchers) involved in every aspect of aviation. Beginning with selection procedures throughout a pilot’s career, aviation psychologists are there to help, however possible.

And because most aviation accidents are due to human error, aviation psychologists often become a part of the investigation. Along with other human factors scientists, all attempt to determine why a person made a mistake. Learning “why” leads to training to avoid this from happening in the future.

An excellent example of human factors and an aircraft accident is found in Ernest Gann’s 1961 best selling memoir, “Fate is the Hunter.” The captain of the airliner that crashed was blamed for causing the accident, but a recreation of the accident revealed the culprit was a spilled cup of coffee, not human error.

Many aviation training programs are designed and conducted by aviation psychologists. Safety seminars are created and taught by aviation psychologists. Engineers and research psychologists design instrument panel gauges, screens, and switches to obtain the optimum placement for easy use by pilots and to avoid misuse of controls by mistake.

The future for aviation psychology

As aircraft operating systems become more complex, the potential for mistakes increases. For this reason, despite more automation, piloting skills still depend on human responses.

Yes, the military fly aircraft without human pilots inside the aircraft (unmanned aerial systems or drones). However, humans still do the flying, in another cockpit, but on the ground, not in the air. And they face the similar demands and challenges as do pilots in the sky. As flying and the aviation industry continue to grow, more aviation psychologists will be utilized. This is a profession that is expanding and becoming more valuable to aviation.

This column is based on a chapter in my next book: 40 Years in the Sky: A Pilot’s Guide to General Aviation (McFarland 2023).

EDITOR’S NOTE: Pilot, Viet Nam veteran and former university professor, Bob Worthington of Las Cruces, New Mexico, is the author of “Under Fire with ARVN Infantry” (https://mcfarlandbooks.com/product/Under-Fire-with-ARVN-Infantry/), and producer of the 2019 film “Combat Advisor in Vietnam” (www.borderlandsmedia.com). Facebook: Bob Worthington Writer. Website: www.BobWorthingtonWriter.com. Bob Worthington has placed excerpts about combat flying in Vietnam (from his books) on his website. Here is a direct link to those excerpts: www.BobWorthingtonWriter.com/combat-flying-in-vietnam/. Every couple of months, he adds another excerpt.

DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this column is the expressed opinion of the author only. Readers are urged to seek the advice of others, including their personal flight instructor. Neither the author, Midwest Flyer Magazine, Flyer Publications, Inc., or their staffs, employees or advertisers assume any liability for the accuracy or content of this column or any other column or article in this publication.

Posted in Columns, Columns, Columns, Oct/Nov 2022, The Left Seat | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

AOPA 2022 Tiger Sweepstakes Winner Surprised!

AOPA 2022 Sweepstakes Tiger on display at EAA AirVenture Oshkosh 2022.
Dave Weiman Photo

Published in Midwest Flyer Magazine October/November 2022 Digital Issue

PETALUMA, CALIF. – Under the guise of an interview about backcountry flying, avid pilot Alex Browne found himself completely speechless when AOPA President Mark Baker delivered the news that he had won the AOPA Sweepstakes Grumman Tiger, July 15.

Browne, an AOPA member since the age of 16, owns a modified Cessna 185 that he flys in the backcountry in California and elsewhere. AOPA Director of Photography Chris Rose was accompanying Baker for the interview. Little did 33-year-old Browne know, AOPA President Mark Baker and AOPA Senior Vice President of Media and Marketing, Kollin Stagnito, were hiding just out of sight eagerly awaiting the signal to step in.

Already surprised by Baker’s sudden appearance, the shock set in as Baker explained that Browne was now the proud owner of the Grumman Tiger and presented him with the aircraft’s Tin Tail Numbers sign. “Whoa, WHOA, WHAT?! No…I’m blown away!” Browne exclaimed. “This is like the first thing I’ve actually won!”

Browne was quick to call his wife to share the good news, “I uhh..I just won a plane…the AOPA sweepstakes, the giveaway of the Grumman Tiger.” Browne’s wife, Soraya, knew the aircraft, and after confirming the aircraft was the same one to grace the cover of a recent AOPA Pilot magazine a few months prior, exclaimed, “I’m speechless!” before heading to the airport with their son, Cal, to celebrate.

Along with winning the Tiger, AOPA hosted Browne and his family at EAA AirVenture Oshkosh in Wisconsin, a trip that Browne said was on his bucket list, so he could meet his new aircraft for the first time.

The Grumman Tiger is nearly unrecognizable since its inside-and-out transformation and is truly one of a kind.

The sweepstakes drawing (for the aircraft and other prizes) is completely random. Sweepstakes administrator Ventura Associates International LLC in New York City handles the drawing and sends AOPA randomly selected entrants’ names with the prize assigned to each, so AOPA can deliver the prizes.

Browne, a commercial pilot, started taking flying lessons when he was 14 years old and earned his private pilot certificate before getting his driver’s license. A passionate outdoorsman, Browne has become adept at flying in the backcountry in his Cessna 185. Of his new Grumman Tiger, he said, “I see this as an opportunity to give back and help boost aviation within the local community. I’m hoping to get more people involved in aviation—the first being my wife!”

“The experience of being surprised by Mark Baker,” Browne said, “was one I’ll never forget. I’m a huge fan of him and everything he has done to promote backcountry flying. I never thought in my wildest dreams that I would have the opportunity to meet Mark in person, let alone have him stand in my hangar!

Posted in All Headlines, AOPA, Headlines, Headlines, Oct/Nov 2022 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Unleaded fuel You’ve got questions

by AOPA President and CEO Mark Baker
Published in Midwest Flyer Magazine October/November 2022 Digital Issue

Reflecting on a great time at EAA AirVenture 2022, my interactions reinforced how focused the general aviation community is, especially on the issue of finding an unleaded fuel replacement for the piston engine fleet.

As I have often stated, I have faced no bigger issue in my time at AOPA than the need for a safe transition to an unleaded future. I will never defend lead, but I will vigorously advocate for a smart transition that does not negatively impact the current fleet.

This is not a matter of politics; it’s a matter of safety. I don’t have to tell you the potential catastrophic impact of using the wrong fuel. But there is a blatant disregard for safety by a local government body in California that is prohibiting the sale of 100LL before we have a replacement fuel that can be used by all aircraft (looking at you, Santa Clara County).
With so many questions on this issue, I wanted to keep you updated on this unleaded fuel transition.

What is AOPA doing to help get an unleaded fuel to market?

First, AOPA is not a fuel provider or developer. AOPA’s role includes leading an industry effort to keep the transition on track and ensure that everyone is aligned and preparing for a seamless conversion to unleaded fuel. We don’t support a specific process or fuel candidate; we support the fuel(s) that will achieve our goal as quickly and safely as possible.

What is the status with GAMI and Swift Fuels?

Both GAMI and Swift Fuels are pursuing the STC route, which is one of two FAA pathways for certification. I know, through my discussions with George Braly of GAMI and Chris D’Acosta of Swift Fuels, that both companies are making good progress. GAMI received FAA approval for hundreds of piston aircraft engine models to burn 100-octane unleaded avgas, and is working with the agency to receive approval of STCs for higher compression engines. This is taking longer than either GAMI or the FAA anticipated, but meetings at Oshkosh hopefully put the process back on track. Swift Fuels expects fleetwide approval for a 100-octane unleaded formulation to be ready to deploy in 2023 and be available fleetwide within three years. The FAA also continues its testing and evaluation program known as the Piston Aviation Fuel Initiative (PAFI), and two fuel candidates are going through that process.

When can pilots realistically expect a full transition to an unleaded fuel for the GA fleet?

While the industry-government partnership is calling for a full transition by 2030, I believe that is a worst-case scenario and I expect this to be achieved before then. All connected—scientists, engineers, GA associations, aircraft and engine manufacturers, policy makers, and airport executives—are committed to getting this done and working every day toward that goal.

Will unleaded fuel be more expensive?

The goal is to ensure that an unleaded higher-octane fuel will not be significantly more expensive than 100LL. While some reports say that 100UL will carry a small cost increase, AOPA has made it clear that the solution cannot be cost-prohibitive. Studies also show that engines using newer fuels being tested may be able to fly longer between maintenance, lowering some operating costs.

Why is the FAA putting politics above safety by allowing airports to prohibit the sale of 100LL during a transition period?

We are taking steps to reverse the irresponsible prohibition of 100LL sales at Reid-Hillview and San Martin in California. We have filed a formal Part 16 complaint that will require the FAA to address this issue, and Congress is reviewing options. All airports across the country must follow the rules that apply when they take federal grants, and the FAA needs to enforce them.

What can pilots do to help ensure that we have a safe and smart transition to an unleaded fuel?

Stay informed and engaged. Review your aircraft’s type certificate data sheet and updated service information from engine and airframe manufacturers to be certain which fuels are allowable in your aircraft. Talk to your airport manager, your airport board, and your representatives in Congress to express the need for 100LL while we work toward a transition. Also stay up to date on the issue and follow the latest news on AOPA’s 100UL information site (aopa.org/100UL).

Together, we will address and meet this challenge.

www.aopa.org            800-872-2672

Posted in AOPA, Columns, Columns, Columns, From AOPA Headquarters, Oct/Nov 2022 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Safety In The Skies–The Airlines vs. GA

by Pete Schoeninger
© Copyright 2022. All rights reserved!
Published in Midwest Flyer Magazine October/November 2022 Digital Issue

Q) What do you hear about the current aircraft market?
A) As of mid-August, I asked two active local aircraft salesmen, Jeff Baum of Wisconsin Aviation in Watertown, and Gavin Leake of Spring City Aviation in Milwaukee. Jeff reported: “…still very little inventory and great interest.” Gavin reported: “Everything remains brisk for the moment.” Jeff’s telephone number is 920-261-4567; Gavin’s telephone number is 218-280-2615.

Q) I am a student pilot. Yesterday, I rode with a new instructor for the first time. He suggested I lean the engine (C-152 0-235 LYC) while taxiing. He also suggested leaning in routine cruising flight. Would you agree?
A) Yes! When running 100LL on the ground, I leaned the mixture. Whether you should or not is your call, after referring to your pilot’s operating handbook (POH), or engine operator’s manual (EOM), or asking your favorite flight instructor or A&P mechanic for their approval. A Cessna 152 operating at full rich, will run out of fuel in about 3.3 hours. (I had to retrieve one from a farm field because a renter forgot about leaning. It had exactly 3.3 hours on the Hobbs meter since takeoff with full fuel onboard.) With proper leaning, you can get much better economy. And be sure to look at your performance graphs in your POH.

Q) Rarely, if ever, do I hear of any kind of an accident with U.S. airlines, even though there are about 1500 flights a day. That’s a terrific safety record, much better than general aviation. What are some reasons for this excellent safety record?
A) I asked two folks who used to work for me at a small airport who are now both pilots on major airlines, and still fly small airplanes as well. Their answers varied somewhat, but both mentioned standardized training and a lot of it, numerous check-rides, and flying 60 – 80 hours a month. Additionally, they mentioned there are TWO experienced pilots onboard, and usually a licensed dispatcher has input as well and approves the flight before they launch. They will NEVER intentionally bust a regulation, fly over gross weight, or bust minimums on an IFR approach. Does that help answer your question?

Q) Are there differences in handling characteristics of long fuselage taildraggers vs shorter ones? What are the most stable (ground handling characteristics) of airplanes you have flown?
A) Yes, generally speaking, airplanes with short fuselages, such as the Piper Pacer, can switch ends on you a little quicker than airplanes with longer fuselages. In my experience, the Cessna 170, American Champion Citabria, and the Piper Super Cub all are especially well-behaved taildraggers.

Q) You said a pilot of a fixed pitch prop airplane should know what his takeoff power should be and check at the beginning on takeoff that the engine is turning up normal RPMs and abort the takeoff if normal takeoff power is not realized. Anything else a pilot should know that is not mentioned in the airplane’s flight manual or pilot’s operating handbook?
A) If at a glance you don’t see usual takeoff RPMs being developed, something is amiss. Stop the takeoff immediately! It’s easy to stop on the runway as you are accelerating through say 20 mph vs trying to fly an airplane with an engine not producing normal power. The most common cause of lack of full power on takeoff is often carb ice accumulation. Another thing I have always recommended is to know a basic approach configuration which you can rely on if you lose any or all your instruments. For instance, in your airplane, a stable approach might be one notch of flaps, and the bottom of the wing level with horizon, and about 1/3 throttle, which will produce a desired airspeed and gentle descent.

Q) My airplane POH says demonstrated crosswind: 12 kts. Is that a legal limitation?
A) My interpretation is no, the POH says that the airplane has been landed in that much crosswind. Maybe it could handle more with a competent pilot at the helm, but maybe not. Something to plan for on cross-country flights to airports with only one runway. If winds of significance are forecast, do some investigating of runway alignment of nearby airports in case the crosswinds at your destination airport are uncomfortable for you.

Q) My airplane flight manual cautions that climbing at Vx (best angle of climb speed) might not allow a safe recovery in the event of power failure at very low altitude. Why?
A) When climbing at Vx, especially in an airplane with steep climb capabilities, like a lightly loaded Cessna 182, or a Piper Super Cub, complete power loss will result in airspeed decaying very fast because of the high nose attitude. Take a flight instructor with you, go up to a safe altitude, and practice this. After the simulated engine failure in a climb at Vx, wait 3 or 4 seconds before doing anything, which seems to be the common time before we react to a completely unexpected emergency, and you will see what happens. I guarantee it will be an eye opener for you.

Q) My Beech Sierra recently developed a little bit of a miss on engine runup. I took the airplane to my shop, and the mechanic there found one bad ignition wire. He suggested that since the other 7 wires were in fair to poor condition that I replace all of them. That would cost $200 plus labor. Do you think the idea to replace all of them is a rip-off or wise decision?
A) Your mechanic is correct. Your airplane is already in his shop, the cowl is off, he has the right tools out to make the repair, so the labor to change seven more wires won’t be too awful. I always felt that anything mechanical related to my airplanes should always be in tip-top shape. A couple of hundred bucks spent on nearly wore out parts before you absolutely need them replaced, is cheap insurance.

Q) I have about $100,000 budgeted to buy a used airplane. I was leaning toward a Skyhawk, but I just got my first ride in a V Tail Bonanza and Wow! Compared to a Skyhawk that Bonanza is like a Corvette vs a Nova. I want one! What would be the drawbacks of Bonanza ownership vs owning a Skyhawk?
A) According to the summer edition of Aircraft Bluebook (https://aircraftbluebook.com/), $100K will get you a C172M Skyhawk (early – mid 1970s,) or a P-35 Bonanza (early 1960s). Almost all aircraft mechanics and shops are familiar with Skyhawks, but not always with Bonanzas. The same for CFIs who will give you a checkout if you get a used Bonanza…not all CFIs are familiar with them. Before committing to buy a Bonanza, be sure there is a nearby shop that is familiar with them. Most shops are familiar with Skyhawks, but less so with Bonanzas, and Bonanzas are lots more complex. Second, you SHOULD have a prepurchase inspection done whether it’s a 50-year-old Skyhawk or a 60-year-old Bonanza, to protect your wallet to some degree from surprises. Having said that, and having owned 50 percent of a Bonanza, and many Skyhawks personally, let me warn you that maintaining an older Bonanza will be more expensive than a Skyhawk. Insurance will be more expensive, especially if you are a relatively low time pilot, or have little or no time in Bonanzas. Center of gravity (CG) range on Bonanzas is small, and it’s easy to get in an aft CG situation. OK, now for the fun stuff… Every Bonanza I have flown is a delight to fly. They are fast, nimble, light on the controls, and easy to land. They do well out of relatively short runways, have excellent visibility, and have comfortable seating. Their fit and finish surpasses many other makes and models. For most people’s wallet, the Skyhawk probably makes more sense, but older Bonanzas are more fun and much faster for the same purchase price. Good luck with either!

Q) My engine operator’s manual suggests 40 wt. oil in the summer and 30 wt. oil in the winter. I have not been able to find either at my local FBO. Aircraft mechanics recommend multi-weight oil, especially in winter, of grade 15W-50 or 20W-50. Your thoughts?
A) I agree.

Q) You recently chided a wealthy man in a $500,000 airplane about not tipping a lineman. Is it routine to tip a lineman, or anyone else in general aviation?
A) It is not required, but just think, that lineman is not making a big salary. Twenty bucks to him for being especially helpful would be most appreciated, and frankly would not hurt the airplane owner. I call it charity with dignity.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Pete Schoeninger is a 40-year general aviation veteran, starting out as a line technician as a teenager, advancing through the ranks to become the co-owner and manager of a fixed base operation, and manager of an airport in a major metropolitan community. He welcomes questions and comments about aircraft ownership via email at PeterSchoeningerLLC@gmail.com.

Posted in Ask Pete, Columns, Columns, Columns, Oct/Nov 2022 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments