Drones, Helping To Clear The Way For Airplanes In Wisconsin

by Hal Davis
WisDOT Bureau of Aeronautics
Published in Midwest Flyer Magazine – December 2021/January 2022 Online Issue

For pilots, a freshly paved runway or new terminal building are airport improvements that are easy to recognize and appreciate. Conversely, obstruction clearing can be one of the most challenging improvements made at an airport, but often goes unnoticed by airport users. While many parts of Wisconsin are home to pristine forests, trees close to the runway can pose a hazard to aircraft. We may think of ourselves as capable backcountry pilots, but the truth is, a shallow, stable approach to the runway is generally safest for most pilots and aircraft. Clear approaches also increase the margin for error during the most critical phases of flight, which is especially important in poor weather conditions. For these reasons, identifying and mitigating trees and other obstructions is a never-ending project for many Wisconsin airports.

In Wisconsin, we require all public-use airports to provide a clear 20:1 approach slope to the runway threshold. This means for every 20 horizontal feet you move away from the threshold, the allowable height increases by 1 foot. For example, a tree 200 feet from the threshold can be a maximum height of 10 feet above the threshold elevation. For runways that serve larger aircraft and/or have instrument approach procedures, the slope is even shallower, and the size of the approach area is increased to provide an even greater margin for error.

To ensure compliance and help airports identify potential problems, the Wisconsin Bureau of Aeronautics (BOA) inspects all public-use airports at a minimum of once every three years. Historically, inspectors utilized simple ground-based tools to identify potential obstructions. These tools are excellent at quickly determining if a problem exists but struggle to provide a complete and accurate picture. To overcome these shortcomings, BOA has acquired a specialized drone which can conduct obstruction surveys from the air.

The process first involves digitally mapping the extent of the survey area and checking for potential flight conflicts with Federal Aviation Regulation Part 107. Flight planning software is then used to set mission parameters and create the drone’s flight path. Once on location, the drone autonomously flies the mission, usually at 300 feet above the ground, and takes hundreds of precisely georeferenced photos along the way. During the flight, real-time positional corrections are provided to the drone via a high-precision Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) base station, and ground control points are used for further data refinement during post-processing. Back in the office, specialized software stitches the images together into both a 2D orthomosaic map and a 3D model upon which further analysis can be performed.

The advantages of utilizing the drone are significant. Whereas previous obstruction evaluations were limited to line of sight from the ground, this process allows the inspector to comprehensively evaluate the entire approach area. In addition, data accuracy is improved over previous collection methods. Finally, additional analysis of the data can answer important questions like whose property is the obstruction on and how many trees need to be cleared. Useful maps can also be created to aid in obstruction reporting, decision-making, and eventually mitigation.

Although the proliferation of unmanned aircraft continues to present challenges to traditional manned aircraft operations, drones are here to stay. Fortunately, new innovations in drone technology should continue to improve our daily lives. We at the BOA think drones should be used to improve our lives as aviators as well and using drones to help clear approaches for aircraft is only step one.

Posted in Columns, Columns, Columns, Dec2021/Jan 2022, Wisconsin Aeronautics Report | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

From the Air and From the Ground

Article & Photos by Yasmina Platt
© Copyright 2021. All rights reserved!
Published in Midwest Flyer Magazine – December 2021/January 2022 Online Issue

While one cannot see Logan Pass, you can picture it just south of the lower left corner of the picture. From there, one can follow the trail (partially paved and can be seen in the picture) to view Hidden Lake and its beautiful valley. The aerial view provides a great shot of it and its general area, including Sperry Glacier in the immediate distance.

 

Yasmina Platt

The mountains are calling, and we must go… no matter how we get there! Although they are actually worth seeing from more than one perspective!

The 3D view from an aircraft provides a fantastic big picture of the area: its historical topography, its bearings (situation awareness)… its grandiosity. It is also a much easier way to visit; almost like viewing it from a couch.

However, stepping foot on the trails feels like being a part of the mountains; an extension of them! Hiking through and over the mountains is a great feeling for me. I love the experience, being in nature, disconnecting from everyday life, the exercise, the challenge, the views, the smell, the ability to stop at any moment and, yes, the wild animals, even though I prefer to see them from a good (safe) distance.

Let’s use a few examples from Glacier National Park to explain further. (Note that some of the aerial and ground pictures are from two different summers.) I’ll start with Hidden Lake, one of Glacier’s easiest and most popular hikes from Logan Pass.

From Logan Pass, one can follow a partially paved trail to view Hidden Lake and its beautiful valley. However, an aerial view provides a great shot of it, plus its general area, including Sperry Glacier in the immediate distance.

Being on the trail, though, allows you to be a part of the landscape. It puts you right in the middle of it all, even if it does not provide views of the area beyond the valley. It’s also not uncommon for mountain goats to be enjoying this same beautiful area as hikers.

Continuing with famous trails… Grinnell Lake and Grinnell Glaciers are amongst visitor favorites. The hike to the lake is fairly easy, especially if shortened by taking a boat across Swiftcurrent Lake and another one (part of the same ticket) across Lake Josephine. But the hike to the glacier is moderate.

Flying over the area clearly shows the difference between Grinnell Lake and Grinnell Glacier. Many first-time visitors question this because they think Grinnell Lake is the one on top, when it’s the one at the bottom. The lake up top is simply part of the glacier that is melting and receding.

One of my first thoughts when hiking to the glacier was that the waterfalls were not as evident from the air as they were from the ground. My second thought was that the Angel Wing (the mountain west of the waterfalls) is much bigger in actuality than the flight portrayed (even with the shadow). I still would have liked to hike up to it, but it was pretty rainy and stormy when we arrived at the glacier, so it’s on the list again for a future trip.

Hiking directly to the glacier is not the only way to view it from the ground. The Highline Trail, also from Logan Pass, has a steep Grinnell Lake Overlook side trail (which may be scary to those afraid of heights), giving hikers a completely different viewpoint. One can look down onto the glacier. This is the longest of the hikes discussed, but it is also one of my favorites.

One of the reasons I enjoy flying over the mountains is to scout my next adventure. This was the case with Iceberg Lake. I loved the way the lake looked from the air, with its deep blue color and being surrounded by sheer glacier walls.

The sheer walls were honestly just as impressive, but in a different way, flying or hiking. Seeing their vertical nature from the air was impressive and seeing their rugged look up close from the trail was spectacular as well. My mom hiked it with me, making it even more special. It was a bit disappointing, though, that Iceberg Lake had no icebergs when we hiked it.

When I flew over Cracker Lake last year, it did not look as impressive to me as other lakes did, but it must have been because I flew too early in the day. The sun was not shining on its water yet, and as it turns out, Cracker Lake has the most beautiful water color of any lake I’ve visited or seen at Glacier National Park. It’s very different seeing it in the shade and the sun. It was quite amazing to see the transition of water color on the lake as the sun rose up over the mountains. I had never seen anything quite like that before.

Glacier is also a great park to view moose, mountain goats (my favorite!), bighorn sheep, and bears of different types. But it’s almost impossible to spot them from an aircraft while maintaining 2,000 feet from the ground, unless you have some good binoculars.

The details of things like the color of the rocks and the sediment in the water is also something one cannot perceive from the air.

There’s no time to be bored in a world as beautiful as ours, so get out and explore! For more pictures related to this article, visit www.airtrails.weebly.com.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Yasmina Platt’s new job has her planning the future of aviation infrastructure for Joby’s electric Vertical Takeoff and Landing (VTOL) aircraft. She also writes an aviation travel blog called “Air Trails” (www.airtrails.weebly.com), in addition to articles on pilot destinations for Midwest Flyer Magazine. Pilots can locate articles Yasmina has written by going to www.MidwestFlyer.com and typing “Yasmina” in the search box.

Posted in Columns, Columns, Columns, Dec2021/Jan 2022, Destinations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

A Little Bit of Cold War History

by Jim Bildilli
Published in Midwest Flyer Magazine – December 2021/January 2022 Online Issue

About half-way across Kansas, if you’re VFR and following I-70 or the old National Road (U.S. 40), you’ll eventually come across the town of Russell, Kansas. Some of us with graying and possibly thinning hair remember the town as the home of former senator and presidential candidate, Robert (Bob) Dole. In many locations around the country, the airports sometimes reflect the influence of a local famous politician, but the Russell municipal airport is very typical of a small-town airport that you’d find most anywhere in the U.S. It currently features a 5000 x 75 ft. north-south concrete runway, and a 1600 x 300 ft. northeast-southwest turf runway. With GPS approaches to Runway 17-35, major airframe and powerplant repairs and 24-hour fuel, it’s a nice place to stop while traveling across the country. Like most small general aviation airports, there’s no restaurant, although there is a courtesy car to make the short trip into town for a bite to eat or perhaps to conduct a little business.

When taxiing to the ramp, there is one structure that absolutely gets your attention. It’s a 32 ft. high steel tower that is reminiscent of a short forest ranger tower that you would usually find near a national forest. However, this is not a forest ranger tower… it’s a tower that was constructed and used in the mid-1940s and early 1950s as an enemy aircraft spotting tower.

Radar coverage in the northern hemisphere had not been developed then to the point where there was wide-area coverage to intercept incoming Russian bombers on their way to wreak havoc on American cities with their new atomic bombs. Most of the towers were placed in less populated areas in the U.S. based on the belief that the Russians would avoid being spotted as easily, than if they flew over large population centers on the east and west coasts.

The tower supports an all-glass cab that was sparsely adorned with a countertop. Other than that, the other essentials included maps, binoculars, a location code, and a telephone to contact the Air Defense Filter Center which was located in Hutchinson, Kansas.

The spotting towers, of which few remain today, were staffed 24-7 by trained local volunteers that even included high school students. The ground observers training manual was published by the U.S. Air Force and contained pictures identifying both American and foreign aircraft. The spotters received a certificate of completion and a keepsake lapel pin to celebrate their accomplishment.

The historical observation tower, which was originally donated by the Shield Drilling Co. in late 1944, remains today, thanks to the restoration efforts of EAA chapter members, Phillip Schulz and Wayne Luff, both of whom have since gone west. Unfortunately, if you are looking forward to climbing the 48-step spiral stairway to the top, access is no longer permitted.

Posted in Airports, All Features, Dec2021/Jan 2022, Features, Features | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Airport User Groups & Crosswind Runway Ineligibility

by Kyle Lewis
Regional Manager
Airports & State Advocacy • Great Lakes Region
Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association
Published in Midwest Flyer Magazine – December 2021/January 2022 Online Issue

In a recent column I spoke of the importance of a local airport pilot or tenant association or user groups. These local groups are very important to the continued viability of any airport, and the planning decisions being made for the long term. Continuing in that theme, let’s focus on the specific duties and interactions that a group like this may undertake.

As discussed, prior, the design of these groups can be structured across the spectrum from informal to formal. No matter what the structure really is, the key to success is finding a positive dialogue with airport management. In some cases, the airport management is a contracted FBO, or it may be a municipal run airport with city or county employees managing the day-to-day operations. In my experience, and this comes from discussions with airport managers at airports of all sizes, a local support group is WANTED! Airport managers rely on these support groups to be the positive influence at an airport. Negativity is not needed, and really does no one any good at all. Trust me, the bad needs to be aired, but there is a way to do it that provides a positive result.

So, you are a member of one these local support groups. What should that group be doing?

Here is the laundry list, and we will discuss it in some detail:
• Be actively engaged in promoting the airport to the community.
• Interact with airport management and/or FBO personnel.
• Take part in airport planning committees.
• Create an inviting community for new pilots or new tenants.
• Have a mission or goal for the support group to accomplish.

The above items are mostly self-explanatory. However, there are two items that are very important – not just for the airport, but for the group itself:
1) Promoting the airport to the community. This by far is the most important tool that an airport has. Noise complaints, perception issues, growth, and a negative drumbeat against the airport can all be dismayed by opening the doors and gates to the public and literally changing hearts and minds.
2) The mission or goal of the airport group can go hand-in-hand with promoting the airport. Airport managers want to show off the airport to the community, but in many cases, he or she is a staff of one, maybe two. They need help! A local user’s group is the perfect way to organize an airport open house, community day, fly-in, food truck rally… well, you get the idea. There is always a way to make the public feel welcome and to want to be part of the airport. When the citizens are on the side of the airport, so follows the politics and the well-being of an airport.

Regional Airport Advocacy & Legislative News

An issue that has been percolating at a few airports over the last couple of years is becoming much more prevalent within the region – crosswind runway ineligibility. Dozens of airport sponsors across the region are facing tough planning decisions. FAA Airport Improvement Plan (AIP) discretionary funding is competitive and the FAA, along with airport sponsor input, must spend these dollars in the most effective way possible.

The FAA is looking closely at additional and crosswind runway eligibility based on wind studies at specific airports. This usually coincides with a master plan update, airport layout plan (ALP) update, or a specific project under consideration. In short, an additional or crosswind runway is recommended only when the wind coverage for a primary runway falls outside of 95 percent coverage. The specific operational situation at the given airport will dictate what timeframes (day or night) the wind velocity and direction are observed for data collection. Other factors used for eligibility are operational data. If the primary runway wind coverage is at or above the 95 percent, the FAA deems the crosswind or additional runway to be ineligible for FAA AIP funding. What does this mean? If ineligible for FAA AIP funding, any rehabilitation, reconstruction, obstruction removal, marking, lighting, etc. will be at the discretion of the local sponsor to fund.

With runway rehabilitation running easily into the millions of dollars, airport sponsors are electing to let the useful life of the runway pavement end and then close the runway. The property the runway occupies may open more land for aeronautical use development, such as hangars, to bolster the airport’s revenue and maintain financial sustainability into the future. In many cases, the closure of these runways has a significant safety impact to the ground operations by removing non-standard intersections or “hotspots” that are now commonplace to see on airport diagrams. AOPA is extensively involved in educating the airport users on what leads to the decision to close a crosswind runway and will help investigate if there are any beneficial reasons to maintain eligibility for funding.

On the legislative front, I will be actively engaged in a bill to be introduced any day (at time of writing) that will provide much needed language and procedural updates to Ohio’s “Airport Protection Act.” This law provides the foundation for the Ohio Department of Transportation, Office of Aviations, tall structure permitting processes. The changes have been in the works for several years but finding the correct timing amid a myriad of other priorities has been challenging. I am working with the Ohio Aviation Association on garnering support and closely monitoring the bill’s progress. Newly added provisions would give the local airport sponsor a stronger voice when it comes to the potential loss of airport utility (kyle.lewis@aopa.org).

Posted in AOPA, AOPA Great Lakes Report, Columns, Columns, Columns, Dec2021/Jan 2022 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 13 Comments

Unusual Attitudes… Playing the cards we’re dealt

by Mark Baker
AOPA President and CEO
Published in Midwest Flyer Magazine – December 2021/January 2022 Online Issue

At some point, we’ve all been told to step outside of our comfort zones — it’s what breeds success, growth, and happiness. That step turned into a leap after a global pandemic disrupted our lives and threw our comfort zones into some unusual attitudes.

COVID-19 has forced us all to embrace the challenges and play the cards we’ve been dealt. At AOPA, that has meant making changes to the way we conduct business and the way we engage with members. It also meant grieving and overcoming loss within our own family. But it doesn’t mean we have lost focus on our mission.

As I reflect on the accomplishments and experiences of the past 12 months, I see a chance to use those lessons to continue forging ahead. We may be heading into year 83 of protecting the freedom to fly, but we still carry a learning mindset – proud but never satisfied. We are always looking for new ways to exceed our members’ expectations and do what’s best for the GA community.

2021 forced us to look at things through a new lens. We took some leaps – we redesigned our tried-and-true AOPA Pilot, expanded our social media presence, and held events like we never had before.

While recovery has been slow for commercial aviation, GA continues to thrive. Pilots are consuming safety videos, participating in seminars, and improving their flying skills in record numbers. And 2021 is on track to be the safest year ever in GA. Now that’s something to celebrate.

We also continued to expand on our founders’ principles in ensuring the long-term health and viability of GA, by continuing to build the pilot community and protecting the interests of all our members. Thanks to generous donations to the AOPA Foundation, our You Can Fly program is stronger than ever.

We’ve created programs to support flying clubs, encourage best practices in flight training, get lapsed pilots back in the air, and help high schoolers learn about careers in aviation. In fact, our High School Aviation STEM curriculum is now in more than 300 schools in 44 states across the country, engaging more than 10,000 students. Because of its success, AOPA’s You Can Fly program received the prestigious STEM.org accreditation.

AOPA also has been hard at work fighting for common-sense legislation, saving our nation’s airports, and making flying less burdensome and cost restrictive. After rallying support from members, and allies in Congress, our team in Washington, D.C., has fought back against the FAA’s misguided interpretation of flight training, that requires operators of certain categories of aircraft to obtain a letter of deviation authority to conduct flight training. Progress is being made to overturn the FAA decision, thanks to an amendment in the National Defense Authorization Act. If all goes to plan, flight training can resume as normal and pilots won’t need to undergo any more unnecessary and burdensome paperwork.

We’re also always on the front lines when it comes to threats to our GA airports. Most recently, we secured a huge win for pilots and aviation businesses at Dillingham Airfield in Hawaii after it faced an impending closure threat. AOPA helped build a multi-front grassroots campaign that garnered support among lawmakers and was joined by more than 450 individuals, earning local media coverage of the issue. Thanks to the team effort, Dillingham will remain open for at least the next three years. AOPA will continue to educate officials on the economic benefits of keeping Dillingham, and all GA airports, open for the long term.

Additionally, we continue to encourage and push for online transparency of FBO prices and fees. More than 300 aviation organizations have joined us in support of the Know Before You Go program, an industry voluntary program that encourages fee and pricing transparency for pilots. We’ve made considerable progress, and applaud such major FBO chains as Atlantic Aviation and others, which have made their pricing transparent. Unfortunately, the lion’s share of larger FBOs still do not post all their prices and fees online. We obviously have more work to do, and we will continue our efforts, especially with the remaining larger FBOs. Not only is this the right thing to do for FBOs, but pricing transparency will help pilots with their preflight planning, promote competition, and provide good customer service. One way or the other, we will get there.

Going into 2022, we still have many issues to tackle, such as the continued search for a fleetwide, drop-in unleaded fuel solution. But it’s hard not to appreciate the wins that were made this past year – professionally and personally. Life is unpredictable, so we should take time to celebrate the positives. For me, that means appreciating every time I get to be in an airplane. So, I’ll leave you with this: Cherish the freedom to fly and play the cards you’re dealt. Blue skies and happy holidays!

www.aopa.org            800-872-2672

Posted in AOPA, Columns, Columns, Columns, Dec2021/Jan 2022, From AOPA Headquarters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Aircraft Sales & Having Fun On Skis!

by Pete Schoeninger
© Copyright 2021. All rights reserved!
Published in Midwest Flyer Magazine – December 2021/January 2022 Online Issue

Q: Is the airplane market still strong? What do you hear from airplane sales professionals you know?
A: To get an up-to-the-minute report, I contacted aircraft broker, Jeff Baum, owner of Wisconsin Aviation in Madison, Watertown, and Juneau, Wisconsin; and Gavin Leake, an aircraft broker in Milwaukee and Burlington. As of October 14, 2021, this is what they had to say:
Baum: “The used airplane market has been acting very much like the housing market: good planes go immediately at exorbitant prices. Many first-time buyers are looking to buy an aircraft, particularly business aircraft. The inventory is very low. There are still reasonable prices on some older models, but buyers need to either really know aircraft or use a good broker. We are seeing many novice buyers making decisions based on what they have learned online and living to regret not getting professional advice.”
Baum continued: “Manufacture production rates are still very low, and with a fair percentage of those aircraft going overseas, there simply are not enough airplanes to replace those being wrecked, economically destroyed or sold out of the country. Couple that with renewed interest in learning to fly and aircraft ownership, it will take a major economic downturn, or some punitive political legislation, to reverse this trend.” For assistance, contact Jeff Baum at 920-261-4567.
Gavin Leake simply stated: “It’s still hot as far as I can tell.” For assistance, contact Gavin Leake at 218-280-2615.

A 1982 F21 Taylorcraft, equipped with wheel penetration “Trick Air Snow Skis.” Photo taken on a lake in the Adirondack Mountains in northeast New York by aircraft owner, Jim Baker of Rochester, New York. Trick Air Skis were invented by Rick and Sandy Discher of Weywauega, Wisconsin, but are now manufactured in Minnesota by Steve Schwister. Trick Air Skis have carbon-fiber strength and an aerodynamic shape that mimics a wing, giving the pilot confidence to take-off and land with ease in the backcountry. Trick Air Skis install quickly, and their wheel-penetration design gives the pilot flexibility to operate on both snow and pavement (https://trickair.com).

Q: You have stated that airplane sales numbers typically drop a little in winter months. With this hot current market, what’s your guess for this winter’s activity?
A: I suspect volume may drop a little as the holidays and taxes sneak up on us, but I don’t see any price decreases unless there are very difficult world events, or a big blast of Covid, major stock market decline, or other unforeseen problem. Let me add a caution for airplane buyers and I hear the same from real estate people: Don’t be tempted to commit to buy something on first sight because you fear it might be sold out from under you. It is better to miss a good deal, than to buy a dud, which could bury you financially.

Q: What kind of skis would you recommend for my Citabria? I generally fly from a paved runway but would like to land on snow-covered frozen lakes and fields.
A: Your best bet would probably be “wheel penetration skis.” There are three versions of skis for light planes: 1) Straight skis, which are only a ski. These offer the best performance (lightest, and less drag) on snow and cost less than other versions, but their drawback is you cannot move the airplane into a hangar, to a gas pump, etc., without some hassle. 2) Wheel penetration skis are probably the most popular for light aircraft. A wheel sticks thru or next to the ski and extends just a bit below the ski. Thus, the wheel is always dragging just a bit through snow, which causes a bit more drag than a straight ski. Sometimes a small wheel will be installed on the rear of the ski, so when operating on a paved area, the ski does not drag. Wheel penetration skis cost more than straight skis, and are heavier, but offer the flexibility that you can move on pavement or snow using only engine power. 3) Retractable skis usually have a hydraulic or electric control to raise and lower the whole ski, so only the ski or tire will make ground contact. This allows a more efficient ski or wheel use, but it is usually heavier than other types of skis, and usually costs more.

Q: How accurate are bluebooks? A friend gets a couple of them and it seems their figures are much lower than current asking prices.
A: Bluebooks report history. Asking prices are not always indicative of selling prices. Two of the most popular bluebooks report every three months, so the amounts shown could reflect sale prices of many months ago. In a rising market, airplane bluebook figures will trail the real world. The same (but opposite) is true if the market drops suddenly. If you look at an average USA light aircraft, it will be about 45 years old. No two are alike in overall condition, hours flown, engine hours, quality of engine overhaul, avionics installed, damage history, paint and interior condition, maintenance records, etc., so value will be different on each airplane.

Q: Now that we have inflation starting in the U.S., aren’t I better off hanging on to my airplane than selling it, until the economy levels off?
A: If you have good use for your airplane, keep it! As for when is it a good time to sell, besides considering current market conditions, you may want to have a talk with your tax preparer to look at the tax ramifications of a profitable sale, and then look closely at your overall financial picture, age, needs in retirement, etc.
If you are not using your airplane enough to justify owning it, then sell it. Idle airplanes depreciate in several ways: 1) An idle engine can begin to rust. 2) Engine overhaul periods, prop overhaul periods, and annual inspections come due based on calendar time, as well as sometimes hours flown. I feel keeping an airplane in storage rather than selling it is usually not a good idea.

Q: An old-timer once told me if I pulled on carb heat on my J-3 Cub just before I reduced power to land, I could kill the engine, and would not know because the prop would continue to turn at glide speed. How could that be?
A: In your Cub, with a small Continental engine, it is possible to have a bit of ice in the carburetor, and you won’t realize it at the time. When you pull on carb heat, some ice could work lose from the throttle plate in your carburetor just as you reduce the power to land. With the throttle plate in the closed or almost closed position, plus some ice present, it is possible to choke off completely the fuel/air mixture your engine needs to continue to fire. Veteran Cub pilots apply carb heat well before power reduction to melt any ice, and you should too!

EDITOR’S NOTE: Pete Schoeninger is a 40-year general aviation veteran, starting out as a line technician as a teenager, advancing through the ranks to become the co-owner and manager of a fixed base operation, and manager of an airport in a major metropolitan community. He welcomes questions and comments via email at PeterSchoeningerLLC@gmail.com.

DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this column is the expressed opinion of the author only, and readers are advised to seek the advice of others, and refer to aircraft owner manuals, manufacturer recommendations, the Federal Aviation Regulations, FAA Aeronautical Information Manual and instructional materials for guidance on aeronautical matters.

Posted in Ask Pete, Columns, Columns, Columns, Dec2021/Jan 2022 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Certification Issues

by Dr. Bill Blank, MD
© Copyright 2021. All rights reserved!
Published in Midwest Flyer Magazine – December 2021/January 2022 Online Issue

Those of you who attended EAA AirVenture this year realized that the FAA had a markedly diminished presence. The FAA Aviation Center was closed. Only one FAA physician, the new Federal Air Surgeon, Dr. Susan E. Northrup, was officially in attendance. One other FAA physician came at his own expense. Normally, several FAA physicians would have been in attendance to help airmen with problems with their flight physicals.

As you saw in the last issue, Dr. Northrup is a retired Air Force physician. She is an MD and has an M.P.H. (Master’s Degree in Public Health). After she retired from the U.S. Air Force (USAF), she first worked for Delta Airlines and then became the Regional Flight Surgeon in FAA’s Southern Region. In addition, she served as the head Regional Flight Surgeon. She is a private pilot. She and her husband, a former F-16 pilot, and retired airline captain, live on an airpark in Georgia. They flew together to Oshkosh in their Harvard Mark IV after their Stearman developed a problem about 30 miles from home. Her background as an active private pilot and regulatory physician makes her uniquely qualified for the position

Dr. Northrup worked quite hard at AirVenture, meeting with various stakeholders, including EAA officials and Aviation Medical Examiners (AMEs), seeking their input, and explaining her future vision for medical certification. She is well aware of the need to improve the certification process.

FAA form 8500-8, which we all complete for our flight physicals, has been unchanged for 13 years.

She is concerned about certification delays. Her goal is to reduce them to less than 60 days.

AMEs are currently limited to submitting no more than 10 pages of an airman’s records electronically. The rest must be mailed. She wants to change that. All records must be scanned, an unnecessary step. During COVID, scanning took up to 35 days. No records are looked at until after scanning. Most AMEs use the pdf format. The government doesn’t. This will necessitate converting all records to the government format, which complicates things. Many letters airmen receive are unduly threatening. Some are being re-written. Some of the legalese is still required but is being softened when possible.

The whole time I have been an AME, the FAA has refused to publish a list of approved medications. She plans to change that and make it available to airmen and AMEs.

Being an ophthalmologist, I pay particular attention to the visual standards. I give some of the ophthalmology lectures to new AMEs and also for AME recurrent training. Sometimes, while giving these lectures, I have wondered “why we are still doing it this way?” Several AMEs met with Dr. Northrup at Oshkosh and made some suggestions.

Recently AMEs received a questionnaire regarding the color vision tests they use. Because of some episodes of cheating by Air Force pilot applicants, the USAF has gone completely to computerized testing. Some form of that may be around the corner for civilian pilots. I am watching that closely. I’ll keep you informed.

As you can see, Dr. Northrup has many issues to address. I wish her well. I think she is going in the right direction.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Columnist William A. Blank is a physician in La Crosse, Wisconsin, and has been an Aviation Medical Examiner (AME) since 1978, and a Senior AME since 1985. Dr. Blank is a retired Ophthalmologist, but still gives some of the ophthalmology lectures at AME renewal seminars. Flying-wise, Dr. Blank holds an Airline Transport Pilot Certificate and has 5600 hours. He is a Certified Instrument Flight Instructor (CFII) and has given over 1200 hours of aerobatic instruction. In addition, Dr. Blank was an airshow performer through the 2014 season and has held a Statement of Aerobatic Competency (SAC) since 1987.

DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this column is the expressed opinion of the author only, and readers are advised to seek the advice of others and refer to the Federal Aviation Regulations and FAA Aeronautical Information Manual for additional information and clarification.

Posted in Columns, Columns, Columns, Dec2021/Jan 2022, High On Health | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Turn Time Twist/Track Throttle Talk

by Richard Morey
© Copyright 2021. All rights reserved!
Published in Midwest Flyer Magazine – December 2021/January 2022 Online Issue

Winter is a wonderful time to fly. Aircraft perform well in the crisp, dense air, so long as you can get them started! Here in the Midwest we are “blessed” with long and generally cold winter weather, which adds challenges that we do not have in warmer weather. With a little foresight, planning and adjusting your preflight actions, winter flying need not be a chore.

Dress for the weather.

Winter is cold. This seems a fairly obvious statement, but considering how some of my students dress for their winter lessons, it is not as well-known as it should be.
Simply stated, dress for the weather! Wear a winter coat, hat, gloves or mittens, long underwear, and boots that will not only keep your feet warm, but be up to walking through snow drifts if you have to make an off-field landing. Most aircraft have limited space in their flight deck. There just is not room to wear all the layers of cold weather gear in some aircraft. Placing your outer layers, such as heavy coat, boots and possibly snow pants in the back seat or baggage compartment, makes sense if you cannot fly comfortably with everything on.

Winter preflight inspections are similar to warm weather inspections in most areas, but have some cold weather specific items added. Snow, ice and the cold weather that brings them require a more careful approach to preflight. The following assumes that the aircraft is stored outside.

Don’t slip!

Be sure of your footing. Ice, snow, and especially black ice can cause slippery conditions. I have taken more than one nasty fall due to slipping on ice I did not see. Look over the area and be especially careful if you have a high-wing aircraft and use the fueling steps to check your gas caps and fuel level. It is awkward enough coming down from those steps, and downright dangerous if you are stepping onto a slick surface.

Frost, Snow and Ice

If there is frost, snow or ice sticking to your aircraft, you need to remove it prior to flight. If it is light or wet snow, you may be able to brush or leaf-blow it off. I really like using a leaf blower for this as brushes can damage the paint and have been known to take off ELT antennas. If the snow/ice/frost is not easily brushed off, then you need to deice. At our airport, that means pulling the aircraft into a heated hangar and letting it melt.
Do remove as much of the contamination as reasonably possible prior to deicing. Once deiced, if you are pulling the wet aircraft into cold temperatures, expect the remaining water to freeze. It would be smart to leave the flaps down for your runup and pull them up just prior to take-off. This minimizes the possibility of the flaps freezing in the up position. Also, double check that the static source and pitot tube are clear and have not iced over.

Brakes

Brakes are another area that need special attention. I believe that wheel pants need to be removed for the winter. If you try to fly with the main gear wheel pants on, you will eventually have to deal with frozen brakes and wheel pants packed with snow. Even without wheel pants, aircraft brakes are prone to freezing up. Most pilots apply brakes far more often than they need to during taxi. This heats the brake discs. If you taxi through snow with a hot brake disc, you will melt the snow, which once you stop moving, could freeze the brake pads to the disc. During preflight, the best way to tell if the brakes are frozen is to kick the tire. With a high-wing aircraft, this is easy, especially if the aircraft has a wing strut to hold onto. Kick the tire as if you are trying to get it to roll. If you hear a snap, you just broke ice freezing the brake pads to the disc. If the wheel moves freely, you did not have ice. It is also possible to freeze up your brakes while taxiing. If you must taxi through snow, be sure to minimize the use of brakes.

I have had to exit the aircraft and kick the tires after a taxi through snow that resulted in frozen brakes. Be sure to shut the engine down prior to exiting!

Hydrophilic Oils & Frozen Brakes

Brake fluid and engine oil are hydrophilic – they love (phallic) to soak up moisture (hydro). This can be a problem for brake function on very cold days. As part of the preflight, brakes are tested by applying them prior to start up. There should be some give to the brakes until they come up hard. With toe brakes, the foot is flexed, and brake fluid compressed. If the brakes feel hard after some movement, they are likely good. If they feel spongy or soft, there could be air in the line or other issues. If they do not move at all, but rather are hard from the get-go, then the brake fluid has soaked up enough moisture to freeze. The ice formed blocks the brake line and does not allow the now solid brake fluid to do its job. There will be no braking action if this occurs. Do not start the aircraft if the brakes come up hard with no compression or movement. The aircraft now needs to go into a warm hangar to melt the frozen brake fluid/water mix. The old fluid will be completely drained and replaced with new.

Preheaters

Engine oil is hydrophilic as well. Water vapor is a byproduct of combustion, so there is a constant source of water vapor for the oil to absorb. When you heat oil, some of the water vapor evaporates. When the engine is running, this water vapor goes out the crank case breather vent tube. This is good, as having water in the engine promotes corrosion.

Most engine heaters work by heating up the oil in the oil pan of the engine. An electric heating element is bonded to the oil pan in standard installations. During this process, water vapor is released from the oil and moves throughout the engine, condensing in the colder areas of the cylinders and in Lycoming engines, on the camshaft. The best practice is to only heat the engine immediately prior to starting up if you have this type of heater.

Tanis-type heaters have heating elements on the oil pan, the cylinder heads and crank case.

If you have a Tanis engine heater, your problems with unwanted moisture during preheat are minimized. Still, I would preheat only prior to start up. One to two hours is generally sufficient, especially if there is a cowl cover or blanket wrapping the cowling.

Forced air heaters work by blowing heated air over the cylinders of the engine. These heaters work quickly, but do not heat the oil as efficiently as the electric heating elements do. At my flight school, we have and use all three types of preheaters. Our company policy is to heat the engine if the outside air temperature is below 30 degrees if the aircraft is sitting outside. The best preheater is a heated hangar. Alas, most of us cannot afford heated hangars, so we make do with what is available.

To review:
Dress for the weather.
Don’t slip.
Remove the aircraft’s main gear wheel pants.
Brush or deice the aircraft to remove all ice, snow or frost prior to take-off.
Pay particular attention to the aircraft static source and pitot tube for ice blockage.
Check your brakes for freeze up, both on the pad/discs and in the lines.

And finally, preheat the aircraft’s engine when the temperature requires, and for a reasonable time-period, prior to start up.
Safe Flying !

DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this column is the expressed opinion of the author only, and readers are advised to seek the advice of their personal flight instructor and others, and refer to the Federal Aviation Regulations, FAA Aeronautical Information Manual, and instructional materials before attempting any procedures discussed herein.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Richard Morey was born into an aviation family. He is the third generation to operate the family FBO and flight school, Morey Airplane Company at Middleton Municipal Airport – Morey Field (C29). Among Richard’s diverse roles include charter pilot, flight instructor, and airport manager. He holds an ATP, CFII, MEII, and is an Airframe and Powerplant Mechanic (A&P) with Inspection Authorization (IA). Richard has been an active flight instructor since 1991 with over 15,000 hours instructing, and almost 19,000 hours total time. Of his many roles, flight instruction is by far his favorite! Comments are welcomed via email at Rich@moreyairport.com or by telephone at 608-836-1711. (www.MoreyAirport.com).

Posted in Columns, Columns, Columns, Dec2021/Jan 2022, Pilot Proficiency | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Let’s Make Instrument Flying Easy, By Prioritizing Tasks

by Michael J. “Mick” Kaufman
© Copyright 2021. All rights reserved!
Published in Midwest Flyer Magazine – December 2021/January 2022 Online Issue

Over the many years of writing this column, I have put emphasis on making instrument flight easier. I have had some recent instructional flights where I watched pilots show me just how difficult a flight can be. We should use checklist flow patterns and acronyms in the cockpit to do tasks in a logical manner. We should also know and understand the by-the-numbers concept that I also have written about previously in my column.

In this article, let’s assume this is for single-pilot IFR, as it would be different with a two-pilot crew. I always use some sort of written checklist while on the ground, and I want to emphasize that this is in an aircraft that is not moving. The latest trend in accidents and incidents is running off the taxiway or running into something while taxiing and programming our navigators. While taxiing, all concentration should be on the task at hand as we humans are not good at multi-tasking. I find it very helpful to program the cleared route into the navigator while on the ramp and before starting the engine, if possible. As we have advanced in technology over the last few years, it is now possible to receive our expected clearance on our tablets with “ForeFlight.” With Garmin “Flight Stream” and other similar devices, it is possible to transfer the data to our navigators.

On a recent trip from Wisconsin to the Los Angeles area, I am sure there were some 50-plus waypoints along my route, which were mostly on airways, especially those in mountainous terrain. As the technology advances, it will soon be possible to receive our route from ATC electronically and having it go directly to our navigators.

In this article, I will be referring to several procedures I use to make flying on instruments easier. They are called by-the-numbers and the six configurations of flight, and they work together and help reduce workload while flying on instruments and can be used in VFR flight as well.

When learning to fly on instruments, these are important concepts. However, as we lose proficiency and become complacent, we tend to forget them. As a review, we will look at these concepts in depth and, hopefully, they will reduce your workload on your next instrument flight.

Six Configurations of Flight
Takeoff and Climb
Cruise Level
Cruise Descent
Approach Level
Approach Descent
Non-Precision Approach Descent

Take-off and climb, in most normally aspirated piston aircraft, require full power and low pitch/high RPMs, full rich mixture (at sea level). Once at a safe altitude, I reduce the propeller for noise abatement; otherwise, full power with leaning above 5000 feet as necessary until reaching cruise altitude. This is so simple, yet I constantly see pilots trying to tweak engine parameters during the climb. It is not necessary and takes the pilot’s concentration away from much more important tasks. This is also where I see pilots begin to start playing with their Primary Flight Display (PFD) and lose concentration on what comes next.

On my recent trip to California in my Bonanza, and on my departure clearance heading back home to Wisconsin, I was to fly the Riverside 2 Departure (RAL2.PDZ). This is an obstacle departure and was not in my GPS database.

The departure called for departing Runway 27, fly a heading of 255 degrees to intercept the 030-degree radial of the Paradise VOR (PDZ), and track it inbound to cross the VOR at or above 5000 feet. If not, we were to climb in a hold till reaching 5000 feet before proceeding on course. This was a “fly the airplane” departure, and the only engine adjustment was the propeller adjustment for noise abatement.

The “5 Ts”
Turn
Time
Twist/Track
Throttle
Talk

I had the frequency to the Paradise VOR set in my second radio with the 030-degree radial selected before takeoff. The 5Ts came into play upon intercepting the 030-degree radial with a turn to 210 degrees, nothing to time, a twist of the Omni Bearing Selector (OBS) to 210 degrees (as I have no HSI), track the radial to the VOR… No throttle as I was still climbing, and no talking with nothing to report at the time. I was able to meet the climb gradient to cross the VOR at 5000, so no hold was necessary. I was asked to report proceeding on-course after crossing Paradise, which I did, and now well on my way to the next waypoint, I engaged the autopilot GPS steering and did my first engine adjustment, which was leaning the mixture as I was on my way to 11000 feet.

FIG !

After reading about my departure out over Riverside, California (KRAL) and looking at the departure procedure (FIG 1), you may be questioning as to why I did certain things, thinking I could have done it an easier way.

For example, why not load the departure from the navigator’s data base… why use the VOR at all… why dial in the 030-degree radial instead of putting in 210… why hand-fly this departure, and instead, use the autopilot?

To answer your questions, first, as I said, obstacle departures are not in the database on my navigator, but they may be in yours. Putting a VOR frequency in a legacy radio and setting a radial is very easy. It has always been my preference to set in a radial when using a VOR. I can then choose whether to track it inbound or outbound when intercepting it. I personally like to hand-fly departures until a lower workload permits me to monitor the autopilot to make sure it is working and programmed properly. The by-the-numbers gave me the pitch attitude and airspeed I needed in the climb to reach the Paradise VOR above my target crossing altitude.

As we look at the concepts I used during my departure of by-the-numbers and the six configurations of flight, we can apply them to the entire flight, which we will do in future issues of Midwest Flyer Magazine. I made one change in the power setting during my initial climb and that was adjusting the prop for noise abatement. I made no screen changes on my Multi-Function Display (MFD); I was just hand-flying the airplane. The screen was set prior to departure and later zoomed out when on the autopilot and my workload permitted. Let’s prioritize tasks – fly by-the-numbers and use the Five (5) Ts.
Until the next issue of Midwest Flyer Magazine, fly safe and more relaxed!

EDITOR’S NOTE: Michael J. “Mick” Kaufman is a Certified Instrument Flight Instructor (CFII) and the program manager of flight operations with the “Bonanza/Baron Pilot Training” organization. He conducts pilot clinics and specialized instruction throughout the U.S. in many makes and models of aircraft, which are equipped with a variety of avionics. Mick is based in Richland Center (93C) and Eagle River, Wisconsin (KEGV). He was named “FAA’s Safety Team Representative of the Year” for Wisconsin in 2008. Readers are encouraged to email questions to captmick@me.com or call 817-988-0174.

DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this column is the expressed opinion of the author only, and readers are advised to seek the advice of their personal flight instructor and others, and refer to the Federal Aviation Regulations, FAA Aeronautical Information Manual and instructional materials before attempting any procedures discussed herein.

Posted in Columns, Columns, Columns, Dec2021/Jan 2022, Instrument Flight | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Is Your Airplane A Tax Deduction? Can it be? Maybe!

by Bob Worthington
© Copyright 2021 All rights reserved!
Published in Midwest Flyer Magazine – December 2021/January 2022 Online Issue

Throughout my ownership of aircraft, every airplane was a tax deduction (a business expense). I was an instrument-rated private pilot, I did not possess any aviation-related business, I was not a commercial pilot… I had full-time employment elsewhere. I will explain what I did, how I did it, and how I remained legal. Keep in mind that claiming your airplane as a tax deduction comes under the purview of the Internal Revenue Service and the Federal Aviation Administration. Additionally, both state and local regulations may also apply. Appropriate resources are listed at the end of this column. Understand that a pilot with a Commercial Pilot Certificate will have more options for using their airplane in a business than a Private Pilot.

Having an airplane as a tax deduction is not a complex matter. To be safe, an aircraft owner should understand applicable IRS and FAA rules that regulate what you want to do. One must also be very adept at record keeping as that fact often separates winners from losers when justifying what you do with the federal government. To me, the biggest part of claiming your aircraft as a tax/business deduction is to be honest. Scheming to declare your airplane as a business expense when it is not, is just looking for trouble. Additionally, defending your business can be time consuming and expensive.

Here are some fast IRS rules. To claim your airplane as a business expense, then obviously, one must have a business. It can be full-time or part-time. A business should be designed to earn a profit (i.e. not a hobby). A business must be created to operate in a manner to make money. Now, there is no federal law requiring any business to be profitable, but the assumption is that the owner is doing everything possible to be profitable.

For many businesses, the path to making money may take years. For example, USA Today took almost five years to find income exceeding expenses.

What is an acceptable expense? The IRS says ordinary and necessary. Ordinary means common to managing the business. If one makes shoes, purchasing leather is an ordinary expense. Necessary refers to the cost of something that is helpful or appropriate to run the business. If one delivers fuel to gas stations, having a tanker truck is necessary. Being necessary does not mandate it to be indispensable or requisite for the business.

An example is a business that has a shaded patio outside the office. This is not directly related to what the business does. But indirectly, it can be a business expense as it provides a safe place for employees to eat lunch and keeps them out of the hot sun while taking a break outside.

What constitutes a business? For tax purposes, there are several forms such as a sole proprietorship (you are the only owner), partnership, and different types of corporations. For me, I was always a sole proprietor, requiring me only to say, I am in business (although state and municipal laws may have their own regulations to follow). If protection of personal assets is a concern, consider a Limited Liability Company (LLC). The structure of an LLC is governed by state statutes.

I became a pilot because my Army assignment required me to travel. Often going by commercial air would take most of a day when my destination would be only 4 hours or so by private aircraft. Pilot friends suggested flying myself would be quicker (and more fun). Thus, the Army paid me to fly my own airplane. Army reimbursements did not cover all my flying expenses, but at that time, the IRS allowed expenses beyond my compensation being tax deductible. About 70 to 80 percent of my flying was tax deductible. When I retired from the Army, my flying was no longer a tax deduction. So now I had to find another way to make, at least, part of my flying a legitimate expense for tax purposes.

I needed to find a business that paid, was legitimate, required my airplane, and could be done in my spare time (I was a full-time business professor). Since I was a writer (business, firearms, and psychology), I figured being an aviation writer might work.

The editor and home office of a weekly aviation newspaper I subscribed to, was less than 2 hours away by airplane. I wrote to him, seeking a writing job, but was told no positions were available. I asked if I could fly down to talk to him. Reluctantly he agreed, saying I could meet him at 4:30 p.m., but he would have to leave around 5:00 p.m.

We met, we talked and talked. I departed at dark and had a new job as the publication’s business editor. I was a pilot, owned an airplane, was a business professor, and now was a paid aviation writer. I was a compensated professional aviation journalist (free-lance, not salaried) tasked with covering aviation conferences and airshows and wrote articles on various aviation businesses. Now the use of my airplane was once again ordinary and necessary for my sole proprietorship business. Soon thereafter I also began writing for other aviation periodicals. Since I had no employees and my job as a professor paid my Social Security contributions, bookkeeping was easy.

I keep a monthly file on every article or book I have written. Another file on income earned and a third file on expenses. This file can become tricky as the IRS may change what can qualify as a tax-deductible expense. For the airplane though, the expenses are easy to justify. Insurance, maintenance, parts, hangar rent, gas and oil, and away overnight parking fees are all collected in another file. For flying I used a separate logbook for every year. At the end of the year, I would total the hours flown and then note those hours flown for business. If I flew 300 hours and 250 were for business, then 83.3% of all my flying costs become a business expense.

The calculations of expenses, depreciation, etc., can be complex. That is why I always use an accounting firm and a CPA to do my taxes. Three times I have been audited. All three times were triggered by administrative errors — none because of tax reports filed by me. The second time the IRS demanded a full examination of my last two years in the Army. For the first-year audit, my wife and I (with our records) spent 8 hours a day for 5 days being scrutinized at a nearby IRS office. This consisted of us justifying all claims cited and then documenting those claims. When it came to my airplane, the examiner noted all my claimed expenses and asked what flying I did. When I explained I flew for the Army in my own airplane, she then asked, “Did the Army require you to own an airplane to fly for them?” I replied no, explaining, “The Army does not require me to own Amtrac, American Airlines, or Greyhound; it just orders me to go somewhere on Army business. How I get there is my business.” She asked if I had copies of those orders, which I showed her. All indicated travel by private air authorized. That ended any further inquiry into the airplane as a deduction.

The audit took a week, and we owed the IRS $40 (for a mistake by the accounting firm regarding expenses on an apartment building we owned and managed). The examiner commented on the preciseness and accuracy of all our files. The audit of the second year was cancelled and I was never audited again for any airplane deductions. The lesson learned is that the accuracy and depth of files backing all claims is extremely important. I cannot emphasize that enough. A word of caution… Not everyone should represent themselves before the IRS.

The IRS does not view an airplane much different than other equipment or vehicles a business needs to earn a buck. Owning a Cessna Citation for a business whose sales area is confined to a 100-mile radius may be a stretch by the IRS. Owning a Cessna 182 for a contractor who builds throughout the state will most likely be accepted without question. Documents, such as a business plan or corporate minutes, can prove helpful with the IRS.

As a pilot (and aircraft owner), a variety of part-time jobs allowed me to use my airplanes as a business expense: as an aviation writer, I flew to cover airshows and aviation conventions; as a business writer, I flew to visit various businesspeople and their businesses; as a university professor, I flew to conferences to present papers; as a management consultant, I flew to meet with clients; and as a real estate developer, I flew to visit land and building projects. All legitimate part-time businesses.

In all cases the travel was a necessary aspect of my business, so I needed a means to get there, therefore using a private aircraft was considered by the IRS as an acceptable form of transportation.

Some words of caution…Using an accountant familiar with the business use of vehicles and IRS regs governing such usage can be vital, as opposed to doing your own taxes. Using an aircraft as a business expense can be complex in that other rules apply. If an airplane is used more than or less than 50% of the time, different accounting procedures must be followed. If the value of an airplane is depreciated over time, surprises may arise when the aircraft is sold or traded. If the sales value of the airplane is more than its depreciated value, then the owner may have to pay taxes on the gain. Recovery of depreciation is ordinary income. I have found that there are other depreciation concerns involved when selling or significantly changing the business use of the airplane. Also keep in mind that every year the IRS Code may have changes that impact you.

I have covered how I used my airplanes as a business deduction. All part-time businesses were created to make extra money (which they did for me) and the tax returns were honest. I maintained extensive files on every transaction involving my work and the use of my airplane. I possessed incontrovertible evidence to support every claim presented in my returns. This is the honest part.

Since I was always a sole proprietorship, all business taxes were filed, using a Schedule C as part of my personal tax return. Another suggestion: the IRS provides ample resources on how to create and manage a small business. But more information may be found through various industry-related associations, or the SBA (Small Business Administration) national network of organizations created to help small businesses such as SCORE (Service Corps of Retired Executives) and SBDC (Small Business Development Centers).

So, what kind of part-time work can you do that makes money, is fun, and requires an airplane to accomplish? One friend, on weekends, appraises land that farmers or ranchers want to sell. His clients are spread all over the state, so he flies over the land to be able to place a value on it. Two other friends, retired military officers (and GA pilots) own rental property in various locations where they were stationed. They would fly to their properties once or twice a year to make repairs on their investment. Another friend (an ex-military pilot) wanted to continue to fly (and deduct the cost), so he bought a Beechcraft Bonanza and became a part-time defense consultant with clients around the country.
What kind of part-time endeavor can you invest in which will require travel, using your airplane? Remember, it must have a profit motive, created to make money, it should be honest, maintain meticulous records, and having a CPA can go far in keeping the IRS away. One last reminder, two federal government agencies regulate your business usage of your airplane: the IRS and the FAA. For some businesses, state and local statutes may also apply. One must comply with all of them.

Thanks to my Certified Public Accountant, Christine, for reviewing this article and keeping the IRS at bay.

Suggested references for a pilot wanting to use an airplane for business.
All are available on the Internet.
IRS Publication 334 – Tax Guide for Small Businesses
IRS Publication 463 – Travel, Entertainment, Gift, and Car Expenses
IRS Publication 535 – Business Expenses
IRS Publication 583 – Business Start-up
AOPA “The Pilot’s Guide to Taxes.”
14 CFR Part 61.113 – Private Pilot Privileges & Limitations: Pilot in Command
FAA AC 61-142 – Sharing Aircraft Operating Expenses
https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/audit-techniques-guides-atgs This is a guide for IRS examiners to use during an audit to ensure the business owner has proper documentation to support compliance with IRS rules and regulations. A helpful guide for business and tax planning.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Pilot, Viet Nam veteran and former university professor, Bob Worthington of Las Cruces, New Mexico, is the author of “Under Fire with ARVN Infantry” (https://mcfarlandbooks.com/product/Under-Fire-with-ARVN-Infantry/), and producer of the 2019 film “Combat Advisor in Vietnam” (www.borderlandsmedia.com). Facebook: Bob Worthington Writer. Website: www.BobWorthingtonWriter.com. Bob Worthington has placed excerpts about combat flying in Vietnam (from his books) on his website. Here is a direct link to those excerpts: www.BobWorthingtonWriter.com/combat-flying-in-vietnam/. Every couple of months he will add another excerpt.

DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this column is the expressed opinion of the author only! Readers are urged to seek the advice of their personal accountant, tax preparer, attorney, and other professionals, and refer to publications and resources available from the Internal Revenue Service, Federal Aviation Administration, and Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association before proceeding in any shape, form, or matter. Neither Midwest Flyer Magazine, Flyer Publications, Inc., or their staff, employees or advertisers assume any liability for the accuracy or content of this column or any other column or article in this publication.

Posted in Columns, Columns, Columns, Dec2021/Jan 2022, The Left Seat | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment